Banking supervision is a crucial part of maintaining financial stability in any country. To strengthen global banking systems, the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) introduces international banking guidelines known as Basel Norms.
For students preparing for UPSC, Banking, SSC, and State PSC exams, understanding the difference between Basel III and the proposed Basel IV is essential.
This article explains both frameworks in simple, easy-to-grasp language with clear comparisons and exam-ready highlights.
Basel Norms are international banking regulations created to ensure that banks maintain adequate capital, risk control, and liquidity to prevent failures during financial crises.
They help banks:
Basel III was introduced after the 2008 Global Financial Crisis, when many banks collapsed due to weak capital structures and poor risk management.
Banks must maintain a stronger capital base to absorb losses.
Minimum requirement increased to 10.5% (or more).
Additional 2.5% buffer to protect the bank during periods of stress.
A rule to ensure banks do not lend excessively without enough capital.
Two major liquidity measures were introduced:
More focus on common equity, the most reliable form of capital.
To make banks stronger, safer, and more resilient against shocks.
Basel IV is not an official term but commonly used to describe the latest set of revisions made by the Basel Committee after Basel III.
It aims to fix gaps and inconsistencies found in Basel III.
It is expected to be implemented between 2025–2030 globally (phased manner).
A more detailed method to assess how risky a loan or investment is.
Banks cannot reduce their risk-weighted assets (RWAs) below 72.5% of the standardized model, even if they use internal models.
Prevents manipulation of risk calculations.
Simplified but tougher calculations for risks like:
Includes adjustments for global systemically important banks (G-SIBs).
Different assets will get more realistic risk weights, forcing banks to hold appropriate capital.
To improve consistency, accuracy, and transparency in bank risk calculations.
Here is a simple comparison to help you understand:
| Feature | Basel III | Basel IV (Proposed) |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Focus | Protect banks after the 2008 crisis | Fix weaknesses in Basel III |
| Capital Requirements | Higher capital + buffers | Even more stringent capital rules |
| Risk Weighting | Mix of standardized & internal models | Internal models restricted; more standardization |
| Output Floor | Not included | Introduced at 72.5% floor |
| Operational Risk | Based on past losses | New standardized approach |
| Credit Risk | Older standardised method | Updated, detailed risk assessment |
| Implementation | 2013 onwards | Expected 2025–2030 (phased) |
| Goal | Improve resilience | Improve consistency & reduce model manipulation |
Because banks were:
Basel IV fixes these issues with more transparency and tougher standards.
Indian banks, especially PSBs, will become more stable.
Banks may need to raise more capital.
RBI will align many Basel IV features with Indian conditions.
A safer banking system benefits depositors and investors.
Think of Basel IV as an upgrade or advanced version of Basel III.
India’s Smart Cities Mission (SCM), launched in 2015, is entering its final stretch with an…
Welcome to the November 2025 Edition of the Affairs PDF – your all-inclusive monthly guide to…
The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) recently announced two major liquidity measures, a ₹1 trillion…
The ocean is full of amazing and mysterious creatures, many of which are rarely seen…
Russian President Vladimir Putin’s 2025 state visit to India marked a major diplomatic milestone, reviving…
In a major boost to Digital India, the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology (MEITY)…