The role of Governors in the Indian federal structure has come under scrutiny, especially concerning their handling of state legislation. Recent interventions by the Supreme Court in cases involving Punjab, Tamil Nadu, and Telangana have highlighted the contentious nature of this issue. The primary concern is whether Governors’ actions or inactions constitute a breach of constitutional principles and an undermining of federalism.
Despite these clear rulings, Governors in some states have continued to delay or withhold assent to Bills. This has prompted states like Kerala and West Bengal to challenge these actions in court. Specifically, Kerala has questioned the Governor’s decision to send certain Bills to the President, only to have them refused without explanation.
The Constitution provides Governors with the option to refer certain Bills to the President for consideration. However, this provision appears to be misused, effectively giving the Union government a veto over state legislation. This undermines the federal structure envisioned in the Constitution, which grants significant legislative autonomy to states.
The misuse of the provision for referring Bills to the President raises fundamental questions about the balance of power between the Centre and the States. At its core, this issue concerns the extent to which the Constitution allows indirect central intervention in state legislative matters. The actions of the Governors, guided by the Union government’s advice, appear to subvert the intended federal balance.
The judicial interventions in the Punjab and Telangana cases have set a precedent for limiting Governors’ discretion in handling state legislation. However, the persistence of such issues suggests a need for further judicial clarification and potential limitations on the use of the option to refer Bills to the President. This would safeguard the federal structure and ensure that state legislatures can function without undue central interference.
The ongoing controversies over the Governors’ handling of state Bills highlight a critical area of constitutional law and federalism in India. The Supreme Court’s adjudication on these matters is essential to delineate the boundaries of Governors’ powers and uphold the federal principles enshrined in the Constitution. This will ensure that state legislatures can operate with the autonomy intended by the framers of the Constitution, free from undue central intervention.
In the realm of luxury timepieces, a select few watches command extraordinary prices that reflect…
The Cabinet Secretary is the highest-ranking civil servant in India, playing a key role in…
Wilhelm Conrad Röntgen, a German mechanical engineer and physicist, became the first person to win…
A series of pager explosions across Lebanon resulted in the deaths of at least nine…
India and the US have committed to deepening their bilateral cooperation across the energy value…
At the 4th RE-Invest Summit, hosted by the Ministry of New and Renewable Energy (MNRE)…