Categories: InternationalNews

Donald Trump Declared Ineligible to Run for President in Colorado by State’s Supreme Court

In a landmark decision, the Colorado Supreme Court, consisting entirely of justices appointed by Democratic governors, declared former U.S. President Donald Trump ineligible for the presidency under the U.S. Constitution’s insurrection clause. This move marks the first-ever use of Section 3 of the 14th Amendment to disqualify a presidential candidate.

Unprecedented Ruling Sparks Legal Battle

The court’s 4-3 decision sets the stage for a legal battle, as Trump’s attorneys vowed to appeal the disqualification immediately to the U.S. Supreme Court, which holds the final authority on constitutional matters. The legal challenge revolves around whether the frontrunner for the GOP nomination can remain in the race.

Insurrection Clause Invoked

The court ruled that Trump is disqualified from holding the presidency under Section 3 of the 14th Amendment, which bars individuals who engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the Constitution from holding office. This decision stems from Trump’s alleged role in inciting the January 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol.

Deadline Looms for Resolution

While the decision has been stayed until January 4, or until the U.S. Supreme Court rules on the case, Colorado officials emphasize the urgency of settling the matter by January 5—the deadline for the state to print its presidential primary ballots.

Political Backlash and Response

Trump’s campaign spokesman, Steven Cheung, labeled the Colorado Supreme Court’s decision as “completely flawed” and promised a swift appeal. The Republican National Committee chairwoman, Ronna McDaniel, characterized it as “election interference,” and the RNC’s legal team expressed intent to support Trump in fighting the ruling.

National Implications and Precedent

The ruling in Colorado raises concerns for Trump’s candidacy as other courts and election officials across the country may follow suit, potentially excluding him from crucial states. Section 3 of the 14th Amendment has been the subject of numerous lawsuits nationally, but this is the first case where the disqualification has been upheld.

 

 

Piyush Shukla

Recent Posts

India Plans Sharp Cut in EU Car Import Tariffs as Trade Deal Nears

India is preparing for a major shift in its trade and automobile policy. As negotiations…

11 hours ago

Republic Day Parade 2026 Highlights 150 Years of ‘Vande Mataram’ Through Rare Artwork

The 77th Republic Day Parade in New Delhi became a unique blend of history, art,…

11 hours ago

Government of India Act, 1935: Provisions, Significance and Criticism

The Government of India Act, 1935 marked a major constitutional experiment under British rule. Enforced…

12 hours ago

India Displays ‘Operation Sindoor’ Valour at 77th Republic Day Celebrations

India marked its 77th Republic Day with a spectacular parade that blended military strength, cultural…

12 hours ago

Beating Retreat Ceremony: Meaning, History and Significance

The Beating Retreat Ceremony is a grand military tradition that marks the formal conclusion of…

12 hours ago

42nd Constitutional Amendment Act, 1976: The ‘Mini Constitution’ of India Explained

The 42nd Constitutional Amendment Act, 1976 is one of the most significant changes ever made…

12 hours ago