India-China Trade Surges to Historic USD 155 Billion Amid Diplomatic Recalibration
The world’s two most populous nations and Asia’s largest economies have reached a historic trade milestone in 2025, signaling a significant shift in their complex bilateral relationship. India and China recorded bilateral trade of USD 155.6 billion in 2025, marking the highest trade volume ever achieved between the two countries and demonstrating the powerful economic complementarities underlying their relationship despite years of geopolitical tensions and diplomatic strain.
This record trade achievement arrives amid a broader normalization of India-China relations, catalyzed by high-level diplomatic engagement and reinforced by Chinese officials’ characterization of the trajectory as entering a “new level of improvement.” The trade surge, coupled with increased exchanges at diplomatic, economic, and institutional levels, suggests a deliberate shift toward managed engagement and pragmatic cooperation on issues of mutual economic benefit.
The record trade figures reflect both the structural interdependence of the world’s most dynamic economies and the determined efforts of political leadership to compartmentalize and manage the multiple dimensions of the India-China relationship. As both nations navigate the complexities of being simultaneous competitors and trading partners, the 2025 trade milestone offers important insights into how major powers can pursue economic cooperation while managing underlying strategic differences.
The USD 155.6 billion bilateral trade volume achieved in 2025 represents a watershed moment in India-China economic relations:
Historical Peak: This figure surpasses all previous trade records between the two countries, reflecting sustained growth trajectory despite periodic diplomatic disruptions.
Year-on-Year Growth: The 12% growth rate demonstrates acceleration in trade even as political relations remain complex, suggesting that commercial forces operate somewhat independently of diplomatic cycles.
Trade Volume Perspective: USD 155.6 billion places India-China bilateral trade among the largest trade relationships globally, with only a handful of country pairs exceeding this volume.
Relative Position: For context, India-China trade volume exceeds India’s trade with the United States, underlining the centrality of China to India’s external trade profile.
A particularly noteworthy dimension of the 2025 trade data involves India’s export performance:
Export Growth: Indian exports to China rose 9.7% during 2025, demonstrating increasing international competitiveness and growing demand for Indian goods and services in Chinese markets.
Export Categories: Indian exports likely include iron ore, textiles, pharmaceuticals, agricultural products, and chemical products—sectors where India maintains competitive advantages.
Market Access: The 9.7% export growth suggests that despite periodic trade tensions and protectionist pressures, Indian exporters are successfully accessing Chinese markets and expanding market share.
Demand Dynamics: Growing Indian export demand reflects China’s substantial import requirements for raw materials and intermediate goods necessary for its manufacturing economy.
Despite the growth in Indian exports, significant trade imbalances persist in India-China bilateral trade:
China’s Export Dominance: China remains the much larger exporter to India, with Chinese exports vastly exceeding Indian exports to China.
Indian Trade Deficit: India operates a considerable trade deficit with China, an ongoing economic challenge that has been subject to political attention and policy scrutiny.
Structural Factors: The imbalance reflects structural differences in the two economies—China’s dominance in manufacturing and China’s central role in global supply chains versus India’s emerging manufacturing capabilities and export sectors.
Policy Implications: The persistent imbalance creates pressures on the Indian side for market access improvements and potential protectionist responses, even as trade volumes increase.
The high-level meeting between Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Chinese President Xi Jinping in Tianjin in August 2025 represents a crucial turning point in the bilateral relationship’s recent trajectory:
Leadership Engagement: Direct engagement between the heads of government at the highest level signals political commitment to improving relations and resolving disputes through dialogue.
Venue Symbolism: Selection of Tianjin, a major commercial and industrial center in China, emphasizes economic dimensions of the relationship alongside political engagement.
Timing: The meeting came at a crucial juncture when tensions, while not eliminated, had begun moderating from their peak levels of previous years.
Official Characterization: Chinese officials’ description of the meeting as marking a shift from “reset and fresh start” toward “sustained engagement” suggests moving beyond temporary diplomatic fixes toward longer-term relationship management frameworks.
The Tianjin meeting produced several concrete outcomes and changed relationship dynamics:
Reduced Border Tensions: While LAC (Line of Actual Control) issues remain unresolved, both sides agreed to manage military forces more carefully and reduce incidents at disputed borders.
Diplomatic Channels: Re-activation of high-level diplomatic, economic, and institutional channels enabled sustained engagement beyond episodic crisis management.
Economic Coordination: Agreement to expand economic cooperation and explore new commercial opportunities in strategic sectors.
Policy Alignment: Expressed commitment to aligning development strategies and coordinating on multilateral issues affecting shared interests.
Cautious Optimism: Both sides adopted measured, realistic language acknowledging differences while emphasizing potential for cooperation on specific issues.
The 2025 engagement differs from previous reset attempts in several important ways:
Institutional Framework: Unlike previous resets that remained primarily political, the current engagement involves sustained institutional coordination and working-level engagement.
Economic Focus: Explicit emphasis on economic cooperation and trade expansion distinguishes this engagement from earlier versions focused primarily on security and political issues.
Multilateral Dimension: Integration of India-China engagement within BRICS and broader emerging economy frameworks provides structural support for bilateral relations.
Realistic Expectations: Both sides appear to have moderated expectations, pursuing pragmatic cooperation on specific areas while acknowledging ongoing differences.
The period following the Tianjin meeting witnessed deliberate expansion of diplomatic channels:
Foreign Office Dialogue: Regular meetings between foreign secretaries and diplomats at multiple levels facilitate policy coordination and issue resolution.
Economic Channels: Trade ministers and business delegations engage regularly to identify opportunities for commercial expansion and address trade grievances.
Institutional Coordination: Regular meetings between relevant government agencies and ministries enable working-level coordination on specific issues.
People-to-People Exchange: Academic, cultural, and scientific exchanges help build understanding and reduce negative perceptions between populations.
A critical dimension of improved relations involves more sophisticated communication management:
Careful Messaging: Both sides have become more careful in public communications, avoiding provocative statements that could reignite tensions.
Media Management: Official statements emphasize cooperation potential while downplaying differences, reducing media sensationalism about disputed issues.
Crisis Communication Protocols: Both sides have strengthened protocols for rapid communication during potential crises to prevent escalation.
Narrative Control: Emphasis on positive developments (trade growth, diplomatic engagement) in official narratives helps shape public perception of bilateral relations.
China’s public support for India’s BRICS presidency represents an important signal in bilateral relations:
Formal Recognition: Public endorsement of India’s BRICS leadership demonstrates China’s comfort with India’s expanded global role and influence.
Institutional Support: China’s readiness to strengthen coordination within BRICS working mechanisms facilitates India’s presidency and enhances India’s ability to advance its agenda.
Emerging Economy Leadership: Both nations position India-China engagement within a framework of emerging economy leadership and Global South representation.
Counter-Narrative: Support for India’s BRICS leadership represents a subtle pushback against Western-centric global governance structures and institutions.
Within BRICS, India-China coordination extends across multiple dimensions:
Development Cooperation: Alignment on development strategies for BRICS members and broader Global South support.
Financial Architecture: Coordination on BRICS bank operations and alternative financial mechanisms to Western-dominated institutions.
Trade Facilitation: BRICS frameworks for trade expansion and commercial cooperation among member states.
Climate and Sustainability: Coordinated positions on climate change, sustainable development, and environmental issues.
Security Cooperation: Intelligence sharing and security coordination within BRICS framework while maintaining confidentiality.
The USD 155.6 billion trade volume demonstrates several important realities about India-China economic relations:
Structural Complementarity: India and China possess fundamentally complementary economic structures—China’s manufacturing dominance matches well with India’s resource endowments and growing consumer market.
Supply Chain Integration: Global supply chains integrate Indian and Chinese producers across multiple sectors, creating interdependencies that survive political tensions.
Market Size: Both nations represent enormous consumer markets attractive to exporters from the other country.
Mutual Benefit: The growing trade volume reflects genuine mutual benefit—both countries gain from the commercial relationship even amid political disagreements.
Pragmatism: Business communities on both sides maintain commercial relationships despite political tensions, driven by profit motives and comparative advantages.
The USD 155.6 billion trade encompasses diverse sectors:
Indian Exports to China: – Iron ore and mineral resources – Textiles and apparel – Pharmaceuticals and chemicals – Agricultural products – Seafood and marine products – Precious metals and gems
Chinese Exports to India: – Electronics and semiconductor components – Machinery and equipment – Optical and medical instruments – Plastics and chemicals – Steel and metals – Electrical machinery
These diverse sectors demonstrate multiple layers of economic integration and mutual dependence.
Both India and China have explicitly positioned their bilateral relationship within a broader emerging economy leadership framework:
Global South Leadership: Joint rhetoric emphasizes India-China cooperation in support of Global South development, poverty alleviation, and equitable global governance.
Alternative Power Center: Implicit positioning of India-China cooperation as an alternative power center to Western-dominated systems.
Development Agenda: Shared commitment to development agendas addressing inequality, climate change, and technological access for developing countries.
Multilateral Reform: Coordination on reforms to international institutions (UN, IMF, World Bank) to better represent emerging economy interests.
Beyond rhetoric, India-China cooperation on Global South issues involves practical initiatives:
Technology Transfer: Cooperation on technology sharing and capacity building for developing countries.
Climate Cooperation: Joint climate action initiatives and coordination on climate finance for developing nations.
Trade Facilitation: BRICS mechanisms facilitating trade among emerging economies and alternatives to Western-dominated trade systems.
Development Finance: Alternative development financing through BRICS bank and other institutions outside Western institutional framework.
The India-China relationship in 2025 exemplifies the complexity of managing simultaneous cooperation and competition between major powers:
Regional Competition: In Asia, India and China compete for influence, resources, and strategic positioning, yet maintain commercial relationships.
Global Positioning: Both nations compete for influence in international institutions and multilateral forums, while coordinating on certain issues.
Strategic Caution: Both sides maintain military readiness and strategic vigilance despite economic cooperation.
Compartmentalization: Economic cooperation coexists with strategic competition, military tension, and political disagreement on multiple issues.
Deliberate Management: Success in maintaining trade relationships despite tensions reflects deliberate management strategies and political commitment to compartmentalization.
Despite improved tone and record trade, several underlying issues remain:
Border Disputes: The LAC remains disputed and militarized despite recent military agreements and communication protocols.
Trade Imbalances: Persistent Indian trade deficits create ongoing tensions and demands for market access and reciprocity.
Technology Competition: Both nations compete intensely in AI, semiconductors, and other strategic technologies.
Strategic Positioning: Divergent strategic interests in Asia, particularly regarding smaller nations’ alignment and regional order preferences.
Mutual Suspicions: Historical grievances and mutual strategic suspicions persist despite improved rhetoric.
Official statements from both sides emphasize stability, predictability, and gradual confidence-building rather than overnight transformation:
Realistic Expectations: Both governments understand that tensions built over years cannot be eliminated overnight and that strategic differences remain fundamental.
Gradual Process: Emphasis on gradual engagement and incremental confidence-building reflects understanding that trust must be earned through sustained positive interactions.
Reversibility Acknowledgment: Both sides implicitly acknowledge that improvements could be reversed by future incidents or policy shifts, hence maintaining military readiness.
Issue-by-Issue Approach: Rather than comprehensive settlements, both sides focus on managing specific issues (border, trade, climate) where mutual benefit exists.
Several external factors continue to influence India-China relations:
US-China Tensions: US-China competition affects India’s strategic positioning and calculations regarding China engagement.
Indo-Pacific Dynamics: Regional tensions with other Asian nations influence India-China relations and cooperation possibilities.
Climate Change: Shared interests in climate action create natural cooperation platforms.
Global Economic Slowdown: Global economic conditions affect bilateral trade and investment flows.
Pandemic Aftereffects: Post-COVID supply chain normalization and recovery affect trade patterns and economic cooperation.
Did you know India is home to some of the tallest and most powerful dams…
Indian Railways has achieved an important milestone by launching the country’s first LNG–Diesel dual-fuel DEMU…
Andhra Pradesh has taken a strong and positive step to support women entrepreneurs by planning…
In February 2026, Elon Musk achieved a historic milestone by becoming the first individual on…
Shri Divakar Jayant, a distinguished officer of the Indian Naval Armament Service (INAS), officially assumed…
Did you know there is an Indian city that earned a famous nickname because of…