Karnataka High Court Directs State to Implement Menstrual Leave Policy Across All Sectors
The Karnataka High Court has directed the state government to strictly implement the menstrual leave policy across all the sectors which also includes the unorganized workforce. The court has also recognized the menstrual leave as a the fundamental right which linked to dignity under Article 21 of the Indian Constitution. This ruling is significant towards the gender sensitive workplace and women’s rights in India.
The High Court had made it clear that the menstrual leave is not a privilege but it is a matter of dignity, equality and humane working conditions.
Justice M. Nagaprasanna have observed that menstruation is the natural biological process and policies which supporting women during this time will be directly uphold the right to life and dignity under the Article 21.
The court have emphasized that ensuring the menstrual health and comfort is part of the broader constitutional promise of the equality and social justice.
The court directed the Karnataka state government to,
This order will remain in to the force until the proposed Karnataka Menstrual Leave and Hygiene Bill, 2025 is formally enacted.
The case was filed by the woman daily wage worker who employed at a hotel in Belagavi.
She highlighted the challenges to performing the physically demanding tasks during menstruation period and sought the extension of the menstrual leave benefits.
The existing government notifications which came in November 2025 which was provided one day of paid menstrual leave in the selected industrial establishments.
However the petitioner have demanded that this benefit to be extended to all the sectors while including the informal jobs.
The court has now agreed and noted that unorganized workers require also the greater protection.
The judgment has been strongly links to the menstrual leave with Article 21 of the Indian Constitution and which guarantees the right to life and personal liberty.
The court have also clarified that implementing the such type of policy does not violate Article 14 (Right to Equality).
Instead it will ensures the substantive equality and it acknowledging the biological differences and providing necessary support.
This interpretation have strengthens the idea that true equality requires the equal treatment but not identical treatment.
Q. Which of the following is NOT part of Article 21 jurisprudence?
A. Right to clean environment
B. Right to dignity
C. Right to vote
D. Right to privacy
The state of Kerala got the first private medical museum, which is established in Ulloor,…
Indian railways has launched the CHIRAG Centre in Hyderabad. It is a dedicated national hub…
India's Sports Ministry has notified the operational rules for the National Sports Board (NSB) and…
Ministry of Statistics and Policy Implementation (MoSPI) has proposed the major overhaul of the Index…
The Assam state government has tabled the Uniform Civil Code (UCC) Bill, 2026 in the…
The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has introduced stricter norms for the directors of Urban…