Multiple Rocket Launcher Systems (MRLS) are vital for modern warfare, providing long-range, high-volume firepower to destroy enemy positions, bunkers, and infrastructure. In India, two prominent MRLS platforms stand out: the indigenous Pinaka system and the Russian Smerch system. Both are operated by the Indian Army but differ significantly in origin, design, and capabilities.
What is the Pinaka Rocket System?
- Origin: Indigenously developed by the Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO), with production by Indian firms like Tata Power SED and L&T.
- Induction: First introduced in the late 1990s; upgraded versions deployed in recent years.
- Type: Multi-barrel rocket launcher mounted on a truck-based platform.
- Range:
- Mark-I: ~40 km
- Mark-II/ER (Extended Range): up to 75 km
- Warhead Types: Can carry high explosive, incendiary, anti-tank, and fragmentation warheads.
- Key Feature: Indigenous, cost-effective, and customizable for India’s terrain and operational needs.
Strengths of Pinaka
- Rapid firing: Can fire 12 rockets in 44 seconds.
- Mobility: Mounted on high-mobility vehicles for deployment in varied terrains.
- Accuracy: New versions incorporate navigation and guidance systems for precision targeting.
- Atmanirbhar Bharat: A symbol of India’s push for defense indigenization.
What is the Smerch Rocket System?
- Origin: Russian-made, developed by the Splav State Research and Production Enterprise.
- Induction in India: Imported and inducted into the Indian Army in the early 2000s.
- Type: Heavy-duty, 12-barrel MRLS mounted on a MAZ-543M truck chassis.
- Range: ~90 km (depending on rocket variant).
- Warhead Types: Capable of carrying cluster munitions, fuel-air explosives, and thermobaric warheads.
- Key Feature: Known for longer range and heavier firepower compared to Pinaka.
Strengths of Smerch
- Extended strike range up to 90 km.
- High firepower with heavier payload capacity.
- Proven combat system with deployment in multiple countries.
- Serves as a force multiplier in large-scale battlefield scenarios.
Pinaka vs Smerch: Comparative Table
| Feature | Pinaka (India) | Smerch (Russia) |
| Origin | India (DRDO) | Russia (Splav) |
| Induction | 1999 onwards | Early 2000s |
| Barrels | 12 | 12 |
| Range | 40–75 km | Up to 90 km |
| Payloads | HE, incendiary, cluster, precision-guided | HE, thermobaric, cluster, fuel-air explosives |
| Mobility | Indian-built trucks | MAZ-543M chassis |
| Rate of Fire | 12 rockets in 44 sec | 12 rockets in 38 sec |
| Key Advantage | Indigenous, cost-effective, guided version | Longer range, heavier warheads |
Key Insights
- Range Advantage: Smerch has a slight edge in range (90 km) compared to Pinaka’s 75 km in its extended version.
- Indigenous Edge: Pinaka, being Indian-made, ensures self-reliance and easier upgrades.
- Operational Flexibility: Pinaka’s guided versions give it better accuracy, while Smerch excels in sheer firepower.
- Cost Factor: Pinaka is more economical, while Smerch is import-dependent and expensive to maintain.
- Strategic Role: Both are complementary—Pinaka for rapid, flexible strikes across India’s varied terrain, and Smerch for deep-strike heavy bombardment.