India’s largest airline, IndiGo, has witnessed widespread flight cancellations and delays, affecting thousands of travellers across several airports. The crisis stemmed from crew shortages triggered by stricter Flight Duty Time Limitation (FDTL) norms, whose final phase was implemented last month. IndiGo — managing over 60% of India’s domestic market — was unable to adjust operations smoothly, resulting in its punctuality collapsing to 19.7% on December 3, its worst performance registered in recent years.
Why IndiGo Was Hit Harder Than Other Airlines
Although the new FDTL norms apply across all carriers, IndiGo faced greater disruption due to its operating model and network size.
1. Massive Scale and High-Frequency Operations
With the largest fleet, busiest schedule, and highest number of daily departures, any staffing imbalance has a multiplied impact on IndiGo.
2. High Share of Late-Night and Early-Morning Flights
IndiGo dominates sectors most affected by the new fatigue-mitigation rules, especially night-time restrictions.
3. Intensive Crew and Aircraft Utilisation Strategy
IndiGo traditionally operates on a lean manpower model, extracting high utilisation from crew and aircraft.
When flying hours were reduced by regulation, IndiGo lacked staffing buffers to absorb the impact.
Why Other Airlines Are Less Affected
Competitors have:
- Grounded aircraft awaiting retrofits
- Delayed aircraft deliveries
This unintentionally left them with spare pilot capacity, making it easier to comply with FDTL norms.
Thus, other airlines had more crew per aircraft, providing flexibility that IndiGo lacked.
What the New FDTL Norms Changed
The revised norms introduced stronger fatigue-control mechanisms for pilots:
Weekly rest increased from 36 to 48 hours
Night landings capped at two (earlier six allowed)
Definition of night time extended by one hour
These reforms significantly tightened scheduling flexibility, especially for airlines with heavy night operations.
Implementation Timeline and Industry Pushback
Originally proposed for June 2024, the rollout was delayed due to objections raised by airlines, including IndiGo, which demanded:
- More time
- Additional crew hiring
- Phased transition
The DGCA eventually enforced a two-phase rollout under Delhi High Court oversight:
- Phase 1 (July): Increased weekly rest (IndiGo managed this)
- Phase 2 (November): Night-time restrictions — this became IndiGo’s breaking point
Operational Domino Effect: Why Minor Delays Became a Meltdown
IndiGo primarily runs A320 and narrow-body operations, with each aircraft flying multiple legs daily.
If earlier delays push pilots beyond duty limits:
- IndiGo must replace entire crew teams
- Insufficient standby staff means gaps remain unfilled
- Small disruptions snowball into mass cancellations
This structural fragility explains why IndiGo unravelled quicker than other carriers.
Scale of Disruptions and Declining Performance
- 1,232 flights cancelled in November
- On-time performance fell from 84.1% (Oct) → 67.7% (Nov)
- December saw further deterioration as congestion, weather, and fatigue caps coincided
This marks a sharp fall for an airline once known for punctuality leadership.
IndiGo’s Official Explanation
IndiGo attributed disruptions to multiple operational stress points:
- Winter schedule adjustments
- Minor tech issues
- Weather conditions
- Rising airport congestion
- Full rollout of FDTL norms
These compounded the crew shortages and network instability.
DGCA’s Response and Corrective Actions
The aviation regulator has directed IndiGo to:
1. Strengthen Crew Planning
Fine-tune rostering to align with new fatigue rules.
2. Improve Airport and ATC Coordination
Enhance communication channels to reduce preventable bottlenecks.
3. Enhance Turnaround & Disruption Management
Speed up ground handling and response mechanisms to cascading delays.
These steps aim to restore operational discipline without violating safety norms.
Pilot Groups Blame IndiGo’s Management Strategy
Pilot associations have criticised IndiGo, alleging:
- Hiring freezes despite two years’ notice
- Non-poaching agreements restricting talent mobility
- Pay stagnation
- Chronic understaffing in operations
They argue IndiGo failed to prepare for predictable regulatory change and may now be using disruptions to pressure DGCA into diluting fatigue rules.
Broader Industry Implications
The IndiGo episode reveals structural challenges in Indian aviation:
- High dependence on lean manpower
- Safety reforms clashing with commercial utilisation practices
- Weather, airspace congestion, and crew fatigue combining into systemic risk
The crisis underscores the importance of fatigue-based safety norms in a fast-growing aviation ecosystem.


